PortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and GC=F is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

^GSPC vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 (^GSPC) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
272.97%
1,134.98%
^GSPC
GC=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^GSPC:

0.51

GC=F:

2.57

Sortino Ratio

^GSPC:

0.84

GC=F:

3.27

Omega Ratio

^GSPC:

1.12

GC=F:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

^GSPC:

0.52

GC=F:

5.57

Martin Ratio

^GSPC:

2.02

GC=F:

15.80

Ulcer Index

^GSPC:

4.87%

GC=F:

2.82%

Daily Std Dev

^GSPC:

19.36%

GC=F:

17.21%

Max Drawdown

^GSPC:

-56.78%

GC=F:

-44.36%

Current Drawdown

^GSPC:

-8.35%

GC=F:

-0.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 28.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has outperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 10.31%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.


^GSPC

YTD

-4.26%

1M

11.24%

6M

-5.02%

1Y

8.55%

5Y*

14.02%

10Y*

10.31%

GC=F

YTD

28.66%

1M

14.61%

6M

26.80%

1Y

46.10%

5Y*

12.93%

10Y*

9.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^GSPC vs. GC=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^GSPC vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 (^GSPC) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.36
2.57
^GSPC
GC=F

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.35%
-0.84%
^GSPC
GC=F

Volatility

^GSPC vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to Gold (GC=F) at 9.21%. This indicates that ^GSPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.43%
9.21%
^GSPC
GC=F